COKE DUST FORMATION IN THE OIL REFINING PROCESS AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND WORKERS' HEALTH
Keywords:
coke dust, PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, hydrophobicity, Fergana Oil Refinery, occupational hygiene, aerodynamic barrier, FFP3, occupational disease, Fergana Valley.Abstract
Objective: To identify the sources of coke dust formation, assess its chemical composition and physico-hygienic characteristics, and evaluate the impact on worker health and the environment at the Fergana Oil Refinery (FNPZ).
Methods: A multidisciplinary methodological approach was applied: gravimetry, aspiration, laser diffraction, computer spirometry (FVC, FEV₁), ECG monitoring (heart rate), skin thermometry at proximal and distal body points, and variance statistics. Workers of 10 leading occupational groups at the AVT 21.10/600 unit were examined.
Results: Dust dispersion analysis revealed: PM₁₀ fraction >70%, PM₂.₅ >30%, enabling deep alveolar penetration. Extreme hydrophobicity of coke dust (93% amorphous carbon) was identified, rendering water-based dust suppression ineffective. Initial dust concentration reached 7.2–8.0 mg/m³ against a MAC of 6.0 mg/m³. Working conditions were classified as hazardous classes 3.1 and 3.2. Cardiovascular strain was documented: heart rate, stroke and minute volumes increased by up to 22%. Following the implementation of the preventive complex, concentration stabilised at 3.9 mg/m³ — reliably below MAC (p<0.01).
Conclusion: Aerodynamic screens up to 6 m high restrict dust dispersal within a 5 km radius. FFP3 personal protective equipment combined with engineering controls significantly reduces occupational disease risk.
References
1.Adilov U.Kh., Khamrakulova M.A., Tuychiev Zh.T., Khashirbaeva D.M. Compilation of sanitary-hygienic characterisation of working conditions based on hygienic assessment of labour conditions: methodological recommendations. Tashkent, 2018. 28 p.
2.Adilov U.Kh., Khashirbaeva D.M. Method for reducing the class of working conditions through the application of effective personal protective equipment: methodological guidelines. Tashkent, 2015. 12 p.
3.Adilov U.Kh., Almatov B.I., Khashirbaeva D.M. Method for hygienic assessment of occupational risk: methodological recommendations. Tashkent, 2017. 24 p.
4.Andriyantseva S.A., Bondarenko A.V. Synthesis and properties of adsorption-active materials derived from coke dust. Scientific Bulletin of Belgorod State University. 2011; Issue 15, No. 9(104): 96.
5.Akhmedova N.M., Ibodullaeva S. Impact of industrial dust on the human body. Universum: Technical Sciences [electronic journal]. 2023; 5(110). URL: https://7universum.com/ru/tech/archive/item/15469
6.Badamshina G.G., Karimova L.K., Tkacheva T.A., Mavrina L.N., Bakirova A.E. Assessment of the combined effect of hazardous substances on the health status of workers in petrochemical and chemical industries. Occupational Medicine and Industrial Ecology. 2013; (4): 5–10.
7.Ivanov A.V., Petrov M.N. Environmental impact of coke dust emissions during petroleum refining. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2021; 206: 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.118126
8.SanPiN RUz No. 0294-11. Hygienic standards for maximum permissible concentrations of hazardous substances in the air of working zones. Tashkent, 2011.
