COMPREHENSIVE DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR SURGICAL TREATMENT OF COMBINED MAXILLOFACIAL INJURIES
Keywords:
Combined maxillofacial injuries; surgical treatment; diagnostic criteria; trauma assessment; imaging methods; multidisciplinary approachAbstract
Combined maxillofacial injuries represent a complex clinical challenge due to their anatomical, functional, and aesthetic implications, as well as frequent association with polytrauma. This study aims to analyze comprehensive diagnostic criteria guiding surgical treatment strategies in patients with combined maxillofacial injuries. The assessment is based on contemporary clinical evidence, imaging technologies, and multidisciplinary diagnostic approaches applied in maxillofacial surgery and trauma care. Particular attention is given to the role of advanced imaging methods, functional assessment, soft tissue and skeletal injury evaluation, and systemic condition analysis in determining optimal surgical tactics. The findings indicate that the use of integrated diagnostic criteria improves injury severity assessment, surgical planning accuracy, and postoperative outcomes. Comprehensive diagnostic evaluation enables individualized surgical decision-making, reduces complication rates, and enhances functional and aesthetic recovery. The results underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary, evidence-based diagnostic framework as a prerequisite for effective surgical management of combined maxillofacial injuries.
References
1.
Ellis, E., & Zide, M. F. (2006). Surgical approaches to the facial skeleton. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
2.
Fonseca, R. J., Walker, R. V., Betts, N. J., Barber, H. D., & Powers, M. P. (2018). Oral and maxillofacial trauma (4th ed.). Elsevier.
3.
Gassner, R., Tuli, T., Hächl, O., Rudisch, A., & Ulmer, H. (2003). Cranio-maxillofacial trauma: A 10 year review of 9,543 cases. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 31(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(02)00168-3
4.
Hupp, J. R., Ellis, E., & Tucker, M. R. (2019). Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery (7th ed.). Elsevier.
5.
Kelley, P., Hopper, R., & Gruss, J. (2007). Evaluation and management of facial fractures. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120(7), 64S–75S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286487.58933.42
6.
Miloro, M., Ghali, G. E., Larsen, P. E., & Waite, P. D. (2012). Peterson’s principles of oral and maxillofacial surgery (3rd ed.). PMPH-USA.
7.
Ташпулатова, Ф. К., Садыков, А. С., & Галиуллин, Т. И. (2017). МЕДИКО-СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ АСПЕКТЫ ТУБЕРКУЛЕЗА ЛЕГКИХ И ВИЧ. Фтизиатрия и пульмонология, (2), 136-136.
8.
Bekembayeva, G. S., & Tashpulatova, F. K. (2021). PROGNOSIS OF RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS COURSE AMONG CHILDREN AND TEENAGERS. Новый день в медицине, (1), 48-51.
9.
Khomova, N., Tashpulatova, F., & Sultanov, S. (2017). Compliance-is patient adherence to treatment, as well as partnerships between doctor and patient.
10.
Ташпулатова, Ф. К., Галиулин, Т. И., & Жумаев, О. А. (2018). АССОЦИАЦИЯ РИСКА РАЗВИТИЯ КАЗЕОЗНОЙ ПНЕВМОНИИ ПРИ ТУБЕРКУЛЕЗЕ ЛЕГКИХ С ГЕНЕТИЧЕСКИМИ МАРКЕРАМИ. Интернаука, (14-1), 52-53.
11.
Вахабов, А. А., & Ташпулатова, Ф. К. (2018). Поражение печени у больных туберкулезом легких при побочных реакциях от противотуберкулезных препаратов. Молодой ученый, (3), 91-93.
12.
Хомова, Н. А., Коломиец, В. М., & Ташпулатова, Ф. К. (2020). Приверженность к лечению больных туберкулезом как фактор риска снижения его эффективности. In Университетская наука: взгляд в будущее (pp. 314-319).
13.
Tashpulatova, F., Shamshieva, N., Mukhteremova, V., Medvedeva, N., & Kurbanov, A. (2021). Phytotherapy in the Complex Treatment of Patients with Drug-Resistant Forms of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(1), 367-372.
14.
Ташпулатова, Ф. К., Жалолов, А. Ж., Медведева, Н. В., & Долгушева, Ю. В. (2016). Уровень комплаенса у больных с лекарственно устойчивым туберкулезом. In Медицина: вызовы сегодняшнего дня (pp. 46-50).
