IMPROVING INFORMATION EXCHANGE MODELS FOR CAREER GUIDANCE OF ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN GRADUATES IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY

Authors

  • Ma’ruf Kuchimov Department of Digital Technologies Tashkent University of Architecture and Construction Tashkent city 100194 Author

Abstract

The study develops a methodology for improving information exchange models in the career guidance process of architecture and design graduates. The methodology integrates universities, employers, employment services, and government organizations through a unified digital information environment. The proposed model includes competency profiling, labor market analytics, automated information exchange, forecasting, and monitoring mechanisms. Experimental implementation demonstrated improved employment outcomes and stronger alignment between graduate competencies and labor market requirements.The study develops a methodology for improving information exchange models in the career guidance process of architecture and design graduates. The methodology integrates universities, employers, employment services, and government organizations through a unified digital information environment. The proposed model includes competency profiling, labor market analytics, automated information exchange, forecasting, and monitoring mechanisms. Experimental implementation demonstrated improved employment outcomes and stronger alignment between graduate competencies and labor market requirements. The study develops a methodology for improving information exchange models in the career guidance process of architecture and design graduates. The methodology integrates universities, employers, employment services, and government organizations through a unified digital information environment. The proposed model includes competency profiling, labor market analytics, automated information exchange, forecasting, and monitoring mechanisms. Experimental implementation demonstrated improved employment outcomes and stronger alignment between graduate competencies and labor market requirements.The study develops a methodology for improving information exchange models in the career guidance process of architecture and design graduates. The methodology integrates universities, employers, employment services, and government organizations through a unified digital information environment. The proposed model includes competency profiling, labor market analytics, automated information exchange, forecasting, and monitoring mechanisms. Experimental implementation demonstrated improved employment outcomes and stronger alignment between graduate competencies and labor market requirements. The study develops a methodology for improving information exchange models in the career guidance process of architecture and design graduates. The methodology integrates universities, employers, employment services, and government organizations through a unified digital information environment. The proposed model includes competency profiling, labor market analytics, automated information exchange, forecasting, and monitoring mechanisms. Experimental implementation demonstrated improved employment outcomes and stronger alignment between graduate competencies and labor market requirements. The study develops a methodology for improving information exchange models in the career guidance process of architecture and design graduates. The methodology integrates universities, employers, employment services, and government organizations through a unified digital information environment. The proposed model includes competency profiling, labor market analytics, automated information exchange, forecasting, and monitoring mechanisms. Experimental implementation demonstrated improved employment outcomes and stronger alignment between graduate competencies and labor market requirements.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

IMPROVING INFORMATION EXCHANGE MODELS FOR CAREER GUIDANCE OF ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN GRADUATES IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY. (2026). Modern American Journal of Linguistics, Education, and Pedagogy, 2(5), 824-832. https://usajournals.org/index.php/6/article/view/2550